TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union vs Communication Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union

El Reno, Oklahoma · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Communication Federal Credit Union

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma · $1 billion – $10 billion

68of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureCorrectional Workers Federal Credit UnionCommunication Federal Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)68
Capital cushion100 (stronger)68
Loan quality94 (stronger)59
Earnings4961 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)82
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)82
Peer percentile85th50th
Total assets$10.5M$2.4B
Deposits / shares$8.6M$2.1B
Capital ratio17.88% (stronger)11.83%
Problem loans0.19% (stronger)1.24%
Net charge-offs-0.08% (stronger)1.57%
Return on assets0.72%1.03% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits47.8% (stronger)77.5%
Uninsured deposits0.1% (stronger)15.6%
Offices118
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—14.9%

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Communication Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions