TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union vs U. S. Employees O. C. Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union

El Reno, Oklahoma · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

U. S. Employees O. C. Federal Credit Union

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma · $100 million – $1 billion

85of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCorrectional Workers Federal Credit UnionU. S. Employees O. C. Federal Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)85
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality94 (stronger)93
Earnings4949
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)80
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)96
Peer percentile85th87th
Total assets$10.5M$213.5M
Deposits / shares$8.6M$181.4M
Capital ratio17.88% (stronger)16.31%
Problem loans0.19% (stronger)0.20%
Net charge-offs-0.08% (stronger)0.69%
Return on assets0.72%0.73% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits47.8% (stronger)80.3%
Uninsured deposits0.1% (stronger)5.1%
Offices14
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 85). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and U. S. Employees O. C. Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions