TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union vs Weokie Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union

El Reno, Oklahoma · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Weokie Federal Credit Union

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma · $1 billion – $10 billion

74of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCorrectional Workers Federal Credit UnionWeokie Federal Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)74
Capital cushion100 (stronger)85
Loan quality94 (stronger)79
Earnings4953 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)62
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)92
Peer percentile85th72nd
Total assets$10.5M$1.5B
Deposits / shares$8.6M$1.1B
Capital ratio17.88% (stronger)13.45%
Problem loans0.19% (stronger)0.64%
Net charge-offs-0.08% (stronger)0.52%
Return on assets0.72%0.82% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits47.8% (stronger)98.6%
Uninsured deposits0.1% (stronger)6.6%
Offices19
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—27.5%

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Weokie Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions