TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Crews Bank & Trust vs Climate First Bank

Bank

Crews Bank & Trust

Wauchula, Florida · $1 billion – $10 billion

85of 100
Very strong

Bank

Climate First Bank

Saint Petersburg, Florida · $1 billion – $10 billion

68of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureCrews Bank & TrustClimate First Bank
TellerScore85 (stronger)68
Capital cushion57 (stronger)47
Loan quality98 (stronger)96
Earnings96 (stronger)69
Funding & liquidity93 (stronger)41
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)98
Peer percentile97th49th
Total assets$2.3B$1.9B
Deposits / shares$2.1B$1.5B
Capital ratio10.69% (stronger)9.66%
Problem loans0.06% (stronger)0.12%
Net charge-offs0.02% (stronger)0.13%
Return on assets1.90% (stronger)1.22%
Loans ÷ deposits63.1% (stronger)107.2%
Uninsured deposits18.7% (stronger)26.4%
Offices184
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)8.6%17.9%

Crews Bank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Crews Bank & Trust leads on 7 and Climate First Bank on 0. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions