Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Crews Bank & Trust vs Pibank, National Association
Metric by metric
| Measure | Crews Bank & Trust | Pibank, National Association |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 85 (stronger) | 63 |
| Capital cushion | 57 (stronger) | 47 |
| Loan quality | 98 (stronger) | 96 |
| Earnings | 96 (stronger) | 1 |
| Funding & liquidity | 93 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 | 99 |
| Peer percentile | 97th | 30th |
| Total assets | $2.3B | $2.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $2.1B | $2.1B |
| Capital ratio | 10.69% (stronger) | 9.71% |
| Problem loans | 0.06% (stronger) | 0.13% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 0.05% |
| Return on assets | 1.90% (stronger) | -0.49% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 63.1% | 53.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 18.7% | 9.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 18 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 8.6% | 15.2% |
Crews Bank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 63). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Crews Bank & Trust leads on 5 and Pibank, National Association on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.