TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cumberland Valley National Bank & Trust Company vs Franklin Bank & Trust Company

Bank

Cumberland Valley National Bank & Trust Company

London, Kentucky · $100 million – $1 billion

69of 100
Moderate

Bank

Franklin Bank & Trust Company

Franklin, Kentucky · $100 million – $1 billion

75of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCumberland Valley National Bank & Trust CompanyFranklin Bank & Trust Company
TellerScore6975 (stronger)
Capital cushion4585 (stronger)
Loan quality93 (stronger)64
Earnings6683 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity64 (stronger)53
Problem-loan coverage97 (stronger)87
Peer percentile40th61st
Total assets$816.1M$803.6M
Deposits / shares$737.2M$650.7M
Capital ratio9.49%13.48% (stronger)
Problem loans0.22% (stronger)1.08%
Net charge-offs-0.08% (stronger)0.15%
Return on assets1.15%1.57% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits74.8% (stronger)105.0%
Uninsured deposits34.1%16.8% (stronger)
Offices135
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)10.9%2.3%

Franklin Bank & Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (75 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cumberland Valley National Bank & Trust Company leads on 3 and Franklin Bank & Trust Company on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions