Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Deerwood Bank vs The First National Bank of Milaca
Metric by metric
| Measure | Deerwood Bank | The First National Bank of Milaca |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 68 | 81 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 31 | 58 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 90 (stronger) | 88 |
| Earnings | 92 | 98 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 58 | 85 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 92 | 95 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 49th | 80th |
| Total assets | $1.5B | $293.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4B | $259.8M |
| Capital ratio | 8.06% | 10.77% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.29% (stronger) | 0.37% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.79% | 1.95% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 68.7% (stronger) | 75.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 45.2% | 14.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 14 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.2% | 17.0% |
The First National Bank of Milaca has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Deerwood Bank leads on 2 and The First National Bank of Milaca on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.