TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Embarrass Vermillion Federal Credit Union vs Smw Financial Credit Union

Credit union

Embarrass Vermillion Federal Credit Union

Aurora, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Credit union

Smw Financial Credit Union

Lino Lakes, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

75of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureEmbarrass Vermillion Federal Credit UnionSmw Financial Credit Union
TellerScore80 (stronger)75
Capital cushion92 (stronger)65
Loan quality68100 (stronger)
Earnings81 (stronger)38
Funding & liquidity6985 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage90100 (stronger)
Peer percentile65th52nd
Total assets$66.7M$87.5M
Deposits / shares$56.8M$77.6M
Capital ratio14.18% (stronger)11.51%
Problem loans0.95%0.01% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.22% (stronger)0.22%
Return on assets1.51% (stronger)0.44%
Loans ÷ deposits91.5%74.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits1.5% (stronger)5.1%
Offices32
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—0.0%

Embarrass Vermillion Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 75). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Embarrass Vermillion Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Smw Financial Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions