TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Emigrant Mercantile Bank vs Gha Federal Credit Union

Bank

Emigrant Mercantile Bank

New York, New York · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Credit union

Gha Federal Credit Union

Greenwich, Connecticut · Under $100 million in assets

91of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureEmigrant Mercantile BankGha Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8091 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality100 (stronger)81
Earnings3180 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity61100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)98
Peer percentile66th90th
Total assets$3.5M$29.7M
Deposits / shares$500K$24.4M
Capital ratio85.67% (stronger)17.51%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.56%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.18%
Return on assets0.29%1.50% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits0.0% (stronger)41.3%
Uninsured deposits50.0%0.9% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Gha Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Emigrant Mercantile Bank leads on 4 and Gha Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions