TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Fairfield Federal Savings and Loan Association of Lancaster vs Union Savings Bank

Bank

Fairfield Federal Savings and Loan Association of Lancaster

Lancaster, Ohio · $100 million – $1 billion

70of 100
Strong

Bank

Union Savings Bank

Cincinnati, Ohio · $1 billion – $10 billion

74of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureFairfield Federal Savings and Loan Association of LancasterUnion Savings Bank
TellerScore7074 (stronger)
Capital cushion68 (stronger)55
Loan quality94 (stronger)77
Earnings38100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity6161
Problem-loan coverage97 (stronger)88
Peer percentile43rd74th
Total assets$281.5M$4.0B
Deposits / shares$247.4M$3.5B
Capital ratio11.82% (stronger)10.51%
Problem loans0.18% (stronger)0.70%
Net charge-offs-0.01% (stronger)-0.01%
Return on assets0.45%2.01% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits99.2% (stronger)99.7%
Uninsured deposits4.4% (stronger)13.4%
Offices339
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)11.4%5.3%

Union Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 70). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Fairfield Federal Savings and Loan Association of Lancaster leads on 5 and Union Savings Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions