Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Farmers Bank & Trust vs Argentine Federal Savings
Metric by metric
| Measure | Farmers Bank & Trust | Argentine Federal Savings |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 96 (stronger) | 51 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 67 |
| Loan quality | 94 (stronger) | 30 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 26 |
| Funding & liquidity | 87 (stronger) | 70 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 76 |
| Peer percentile | 100th | 10th |
| Total assets | $1.1B | $70.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $699.1M | $56.0M |
| Capital ratio | 23.97% (stronger) | 11.71% |
| Problem loans | 0.19% (stronger) | 2.11% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 2.56% (stronger) | 0.15% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 71.3% (stronger) | 85.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 16.6% (stronger) | 19.5% |
| Offices | 9 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.7% | — |
Farmers Bank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (96 vs 51). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Farmers Bank & Trust leads on 7 and Argentine Federal Savings on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.