Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First Bank Chicago vs Abbott Laboratories Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | First Bank Chicago | Abbott Laboratories Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 52 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 41 | 95 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 64 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 31 | 58 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 62 | 98 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 79 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 9th | 97th |
| Total assets | $2.2B | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.8B | $981.6M |
| Capital ratio | 9.09% | 14.49% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.09% | 0.11% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.15% (stronger) | 0.16% |
| Return on assets | 0.28% | 0.95% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 85.0% | 62.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 26.6% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.0% | — |
Abbott Laboratories Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First Bank Chicago leads on 1 and Abbott Laboratories Credit Union on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.