Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First Bank Chicago vs Brickyard Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | First Bank Chicago | Brickyard Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 52 | 84 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 41 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 64 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 31 | 74 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 62 (stronger) | 38 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 79 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 9th | 86th |
| Total assets | $2.2B | $159.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.8B | $123.1M |
| Capital ratio | 9.09% | 15.64% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.09% | 0.13% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.15% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.28% | 1.35% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 85.0% (stronger) | 96.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 26.6% (stronger) | 39.0% |
| Offices | 3 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.0% | — |
Brickyard Bank has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First Bank Chicago leads on 2 and Brickyard Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.