Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First Heritage Bank vs Arbor Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | First Heritage Bank | Arbor Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 79 (stronger) | 57 |
| Capital cushion | 52 (stronger) | 37 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 66 |
| Earnings | 93 (stronger) | 67 |
| Funding & liquidity | 68 (stronger) | 51 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 82 |
| Peer percentile | 63rd | 14th |
| Total assets | $72.1M | $701.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $59.9M | $607.8M |
| Capital ratio | 10.21% (stronger) | 8.69% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 1.03% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.01% |
| Return on assets | 1.82% (stronger) | 1.16% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 92.2% (stronger) | 97.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 9.0% (stronger) | 25.7% |
| Offices | 2 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 0.9% |
First Heritage Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First Heritage Bank leads on 7 and Arbor Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.