TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

First National Bank of Central Texas vs Incommons Bank, N.A.

Bank

First National Bank of Central Texas

Waco, Texas · $1 billion – $10 billion

81of 100
Strong

Bank

Incommons Bank, N.A.

Mexia, Texas · $100 million – $1 billion

73of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureFirst National Bank of Central TexasIncommons Bank, N.A.
TellerScore81 (stronger)73
Capital cushion58 (stronger)52
Loan quality97 (stronger)86
Earnings100 (stronger)84
Funding & liquidity6567 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage98 (stronger)89
Peer percentile91st53rd
Total assets$1.8B$277.6M
Deposits / shares$1.6B$245.8M
Capital ratio10.83% (stronger)10.20%
Problem loans0.10% (stronger)0.41%
Net charge-offs0.02% (stronger)0.04%
Return on assets2.55% (stronger)1.60%
Loans ÷ deposits87.8%79.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits21.1% (stronger)28.1%
Offices86
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—34.8%

First National Bank of Central Texas has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First National Bank of Central Texas leads on 6 and Incommons Bank, N.A. on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions