Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First National Bank of Omaha vs Holcomb Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | First National Bank of Omaha | Holcomb Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 | 72 |
| Capital cushion | 58 (stronger) | 38 |
| Loan quality | 74 | 99 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 92 (stronger) | 81 |
| Funding & liquidity | 55 | 63 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 92 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 79th | 50th |
| Total assets | $34.2B | $304.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $27.8B | $239.4M |
| Capital ratio | 10.83% (stronger) | 8.84% |
| Problem loans | 0.78% | 0.03% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 1.84% | -0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.79% (stronger) | 1.53% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 84.5% (stronger) | 95.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 33.9% | 16.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 125 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 1,803 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 64.9 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 25.9% | 5.1% |
Both have the same TellerScore. On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First National Bank of Omaha leads on 3 and Holcomb Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.