Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First National Bank of Pulaski vs First National Bank of Tennessee
Metric by metric
| Measure | First National Bank of Pulaski | First National Bank of Tennessee |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 | 86 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 63 | 66 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 92 (stronger) | 91 |
| Earnings | 76 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 67 | 91 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 83rd | 97th |
| Total assets | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Capital ratio | 11.32% | 11.55% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.24% (stronger) | 0.28% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.40% | 2.11% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 76.3% | 58.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 29.7% | 23.1% (stronger) |
| Offices | 13 | 7 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.6% | — |
First National Bank of Tennessee has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First National Bank of Pulaski leads on 1 and First National Bank of Tennessee on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.