Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First Option Bank vs TriCentury Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | First Option Bank | TriCentury Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 68 | 77 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 32 | 58 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 99 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 77 | 87 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 60 (stronger) | 50 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 37th | 68th |
| Total assets | $817.6M | $213.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $722.1M | $135.1M |
| Capital ratio | 8.18% | 10.76% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.02% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.53% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.44% | 1.68% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 66.8% (stronger) | 131.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 44.8% | 13.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 10 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 9.6% | — |
TriCentury Bank has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First Option Bank leads on 1 and TriCentury Bank on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Spring Hill, KS