Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Frandsen Bank & Trust vs State Bank of Bellingham
Metric by metric
| Measure | Frandsen Bank & Trust | State Bank of Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 71 (stronger) | 62 |
| Capital cushion | 50 | 98 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 76 (stronger) | 17 |
| Earnings | 93 (stronger) | 29 |
| Funding & liquidity | 62 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 89 (stronger) | 80 |
| Peer percentile | 63rd | 20th |
| Total assets | $3.7B | $46.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $3.1B | $38.4M |
| Capital ratio | 10.02% | 14.81% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.71% (stronger) | 2.50% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.11% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.82% (stronger) | 0.22% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 79.5% | 58.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 31.8% | 11.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 39 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 7.9% | — |
Frandsen Bank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (71 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Frandsen Bank & Trust leads on 3 and State Bank of Bellingham on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.