TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Frandsen Bank & Trust vs Woodlands National Bank

Bank

Frandsen Bank & Trust

Lonsdale, Minnesota · $1 billion – $10 billion

71of 100
Strong

Bank

Woodlands National Bank

Hinckley, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

62of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureFrandsen Bank & TrustWoodlands National Bank
TellerScore71 (stronger)62
Capital cushion5062 (stronger)
Loan quality76 (stronger)53
Earnings93 (stronger)45
Funding & liquidity6284 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage8989
Peer percentile63rd22nd
Total assets$3.7B$331.0M
Deposits / shares$3.1B$298.5M
Capital ratio10.02%11.20% (stronger)
Problem loans0.71% (stronger)1.42%
Net charge-offs0.11% (stronger)0.30%
Return on assets1.82% (stronger)0.63%
Loans ÷ deposits79.5%40.1% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits31.8%29.6% (stronger)
Offices397
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)7.9%29.8%

Frandsen Bank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (71 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Frandsen Bank & Trust leads on 4 and Woodlands National Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions