Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Frost Bank vs Falcon International Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Frost Bank | Falcon International Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 66 | 85 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 41 | 84 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 82 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 73 | 81 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 59 | 60 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 58th | 97th |
| Total assets | $54.0B | $2.2B |
| Deposits / shares | $43.7B | $2.0B |
| Capital ratio | 9.08% | 13.44% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.55% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.14% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.31% | 1.53% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 52.0% (stronger) | 73.7% |
| Uninsured deposits | 52.2% | 39.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 211 | 18 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 323 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 7.4 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 43.5% | 23.7% |
Falcon International Bank has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Frost Bank leads on 1 and Falcon International Bank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.