TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Gaf Linden Employees Federal Credit Union vs N. J. Latvian Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Gaf Linden Employees Federal Credit Union

Parsippany, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Credit union

N. J. Latvian Federal Credit Union

Freehold, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

66of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureGaf Linden Employees Federal Credit UnionN. J. Latvian Federal Credit Union
TellerScore80 (stronger)66
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality100 (stronger)41
Earnings06 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)98
Peer percentile65th32nd
Total assets$3.9M$4.7M
Deposits / shares$3.2M$4.1M
Capital ratio18.08% (stronger)16.36%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)1.76%
Net charge-offs17.26%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets-3.93%-0.34% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits28.5%8.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Gaf Linden Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 66). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Gaf Linden Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and N. J. Latvian Federal Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions