Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Global Federal Credit Union vs Tongass Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Global Federal Credit Union | Tongass Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 53 | 73 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 47 | 79 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 53 | 86 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 39 (stronger) | 32 |
| Funding & liquidity | 67 | 79 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 75 | 95 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 19th | 60th |
| Total assets | $13.0B | $251.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $11.3B | $213.8M |
| Capital ratio | 9.70% | 12.86% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.42% | 0.43% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.58% | 0.24% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.48% (stronger) | 0.30% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 93.3% | 81.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 9.7% | 5.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 34 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 21.7% | — |
Tongass Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (73 vs 53). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Global Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and Tongass Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.