TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Gowanda Area Federal Credit Union vs Griffith Institute Employees Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Gowanda Area Federal Credit Union

Gowanda, New York · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Griffith Institute Employees Federal Credit Union

Springville, New York · Under $100 million in assets

64of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureGowanda Area Federal Credit UnionGriffith Institute Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore99 (stronger)64
Capital cushion100 (stronger)40
Loan quality100 (stronger)81
Earnings96 (stronger)36
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)95
Peer percentile99th28th
Total assets$33.5M$6.5M
Deposits / shares$28.1M$6.0M
Capital ratio16.06% (stronger)8.96%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.56%
Net charge-offs0.02%-0.03% (stronger)
Return on assets1.91% (stronger)0.39%
Loans ÷ deposits45.0% (stronger)45.1%
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Gowanda Area Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 64). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Gowanda Area Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Griffith Institute Employees Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions