TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Grand Trunk Battle Creek Emp Federal Credit Union vs Kalsee Credit Union

Credit union

Grand Trunk Battle Creek Emp Federal Credit Union

Battle Creek, Michigan · Under $100 million in assets

86of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Kalsee Credit Union

Kalamazoo, Michigan · $100 million – $1 billion

70of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureGrand Trunk Battle Creek Emp Federal Credit UnionKalsee Credit Union
TellerScore86 (stronger)70
Capital cushion100 (stronger)56
Loan quality7690 (stronger)
Earnings59 (stronger)52
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)72
Problem-loan coverage97 (stronger)95
Peer percentile80th51st
Total assets$39.7M$291.5M
Deposits / shares$31.3M$261.8M
Capital ratio20.59% (stronger)10.60%
Problem loans0.72%0.31% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.92%0.51% (stronger)
Return on assets0.97% (stronger)0.80%
Loans ÷ deposits47.6% (stronger)87.8%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)6.7%
Offices27
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—5.0%

Grand Trunk Battle Creek Emp Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 70). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Grand Trunk Battle Creek Emp Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Kalsee Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions