TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union vs Alternatives Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union

Blasdell, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

96of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Alternatives Federal Credit Union

Ithaca, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

29of 100
Low

Metric by metric

MeasureGreater Woodlawn Federal Credit UnionAlternatives Federal Credit Union
TellerScore96 (stronger)29
Capital cushion100 (stronger)38
Loan quality96 (stronger)0
Earnings85 (stronger)0
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)93
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)36
Peer percentile99th0th
Total assets$168.4M$161.4M
Deposits / shares$127.8M$144.5M
Capital ratio23.92% (stronger)8.83%
Problem loans0.12% (stronger)4.71%
Net charge-offs0.03% (stronger)2.16%
Return on assets1.62% (stronger)-1.01%
Loans ÷ deposits55.9% (stronger)67.4%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)8.3%
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)4.9%8.9%

Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (96 vs 29). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Alternatives Federal Credit Union on 0. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions