TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union vs Local 41 I.B.E.W. Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union

Blasdell, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

96of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Local 41 I.B.E.W. Federal Credit Union

Orchard Park, New York · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureGreater Woodlawn Federal Credit UnionLocal 41 I.B.E.W. Federal Credit Union
TellerScore96 (stronger)88
Capital cushion100 (stronger)74
Loan quality96100 (stronger)
Earnings85 (stronger)78
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100100
Peer percentile99th85th
Total assets$168.4M$19.4M
Deposits / shares$127.8M$17.0M
Capital ratio23.92% (stronger)12.41%
Problem loans0.12%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.03%-0.05% (stronger)
Return on assets1.62% (stronger)1.45%
Loans ÷ deposits55.9% (stronger)58.6%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)1.3%
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)4.9%—

Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (96 vs 88). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Local 41 I.B.E.W. Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions