TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Greenwich Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union vs Landings Credit Union

Credit union

Greenwich Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Greenwich, Connecticut · Under $100 million in assets

89of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Landings Credit Union

Tempe, Arizona · $100 million – $1 billion

71of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureGreenwich Municipal Employees Federal Credit UnionLandings Credit Union
TellerScore89 (stronger)71
Capital cushion95 (stronger)57
Loan quality7174 (stronger)
Earnings90 (stronger)57
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)99
Problem-loan coverage97 (stronger)90
Peer percentile87th54th
Total assets$32.6M$263.2M
Deposits / shares$27.7M$234.3M
Capital ratio14.53% (stronger)10.72%
Problem loans0.87%0.79% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.63%
Return on assets1.75% (stronger)0.91%
Loans ÷ deposits33.0% (stronger)61.6%
Uninsured deposits5.4% (stronger)5.5%
Offices34
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Greenwich Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 71). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Greenwich Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Landings Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions