Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Heritage Bank of Schaumburg vs Abbott Laboratories Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Heritage Bank of Schaumburg | Abbott Laboratories Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 83 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 59 | 95 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 96 |
| Earnings | 78 (stronger) | 58 |
| Funding & liquidity | 98 | 98 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 99 |
| Peer percentile | 84th | 97th |
| Total assets | $150.0M | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $126.5M | $981.6M |
| Capital ratio | 10.86% | 14.49% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.11% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.16% |
| Return on assets | 1.44% (stronger) | 0.95% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 62.3% (stronger) | 62.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 6.5% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Abbott Laboratories Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 83). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Heritage Bank of Schaumburg leads on 4 and Abbott Laboratories Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.