TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Idb Global Federal Credit Union vs O.A.S. Staff Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Idb Global Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · $100 million – $1 billion

74of 100
Strong

Credit union

O.A.S. Staff Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · $100 million – $1 billion

37of 100
Low

Metric by metric

MeasureIdb Global Federal Credit UnionO.A.S. Staff Federal Credit Union
TellerScore74 (stronger)37
Capital cushion73 (stronger)26
Loan quality96 (stronger)14
Earnings38 (stronger)25
Funding & liquidity7198 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)60
Peer percentile63rd1st
Total assets$842.4M$282.4M
Deposits / shares$713.6M$264.9M
Capital ratio12.34% (stronger)7.63%
Problem loans0.13% (stronger)2.58%
Net charge-offs0.04% (stronger)0.07%
Return on assets0.45% (stronger)0.12%
Loans ÷ deposits78.4%62.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits24.5%8.0% (stronger)
Offices10
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.9%—

Idb Global Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 37). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Idb Global Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and O.A.S. Staff Federal Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions