Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Industrial Bank vs Lee Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Lee Federal Credit Union
Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Industrial Bank | Lee Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 52 | 99 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 0 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 21 | 95 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 79 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 55 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 8th | 99th |
| Total assets | $774.2M | $5.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $607.0M | $2.7M |
| Capital ratio | 15.23% | 50.68% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 6.56% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 1.17% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.01% | 1.86% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 66.3% | 44.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 28.0% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 9 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 56.3% | — |
Lee Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Industrial Bank leads on 0 and Lee Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.