TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

InterBank vs Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union

Bank

InterBank

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma · $1 billion – $10 billion

62of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union

El Reno, Oklahoma · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureInterBankCorrectional Workers Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6288 (stronger)
Capital cushion61100 (stronger)
Loan quality4894 (stronger)
Earnings100 (stronger)49
Funding & liquidity28100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage7899 (stronger)
Peer percentile27th85th
Total assets$5.3B$10.5M
Deposits / shares$4.6B$8.6M
Capital ratio11.06%17.88% (stronger)
Problem loans1.56%0.19% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.01%-0.08% (stronger)
Return on assets3.22% (stronger)0.72%
Loans ÷ deposits103.2%47.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits41.0%0.1% (stronger)
Offices401
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)11.3%—

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), InterBank leads on 1 and Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions