Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
International Bank of Chicago vs Abbott Laboratories Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | International Bank of Chicago | Abbott Laboratories Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 75 | 95 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 98 (stronger) | 96 |
| Earnings | 93 (stronger) | 58 |
| Funding & liquidity | 46 | 98 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 91 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 82nd | 97th |
| Total assets | $982.7M | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $863.0M | $981.6M |
| Capital ratio | 12.54% | 14.49% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.05% (stronger) | 0.11% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% (stronger) | 0.16% |
| Return on assets | 1.82% (stronger) | 0.95% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 85.2% | 62.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 41.4% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 6 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 8.1% | — |
Abbott Laboratories Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 82). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), International Bank of Chicago leads on 3 and Abbott Laboratories Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.