TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Investment Savings Bank vs Altoona Area Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

Investment Savings Bank

Altoona, Pennsylvania · $100 million – $1 billion

86of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Altoona Area Employees Federal Credit Union

Altoona, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureInvestment Savings BankAltoona Area Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore86 (stronger)84
Capital cushion100 (stronger)65
Loan quality96100 (stronger)
Earnings3673 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage99100 (stronger)
Peer percentile90th75th
Total assets$105.2M$19.4M
Deposits / shares$75.5M$17.2M
Capital ratio21.72% (stronger)11.50%
Problem loans0.13%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.05%-0.11% (stronger)
Return on assets0.41%1.32% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits58.6%32.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.4%0.8% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)14.6%—

Investment Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 84). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Investment Savings Bank leads on 2 and Altoona Area Employees Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions