Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Ives Bank vs Sikorsky Financial Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Ives Bank | Sikorsky Financial Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 67 | 84 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 89 (stronger) | 79 |
| Loan quality | 53 | 92 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 63 | 77 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 41 | 78 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 84 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 44th | 93rd |
| Total assets | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Capital ratio | 13.87% (stronger) | 12.93% |
| Problem loans | 1.41% | 0.25% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% (stronger) | 0.11% |
| Return on assets | 1.08% | 1.42% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 104.0% | 82.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 28.8% | 4.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 16 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 10.9% | — |
Sikorsky Financial Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Ives Bank leads on 2 and Sikorsky Financial Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Brookfield, CT