Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Kaw Valley State Bank and Trust Company vs Capitol Federal Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Kaw Valley State Bank and Trust Company | Capitol Federal Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 85 (stronger) | 61 |
| Capital cushion | 67 (stronger) | 46 |
| Loan quality | 97 (stronger) | 79 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 56 |
| Funding & liquidity | 70 (stronger) | 50 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 90 |
| Peer percentile | 88th | 24th |
| Total assets | $295.8M | $9.7B |
| Deposits / shares | $250.6M | $6.9B |
| Capital ratio | 11.73% (stronger) | 9.57% |
| Problem loans | 0.08% (stronger) | 0.62% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.02% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 2.17% (stronger) | 0.90% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 76.9% (stronger) | 118.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.0% | 11.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 45 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 2.4% | 14.2% |
Kaw Valley State Bank and Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Kaw Valley State Bank and Trust Company leads on 6 and Capitol Federal Savings Bank on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.