TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Kbr Heritage Federal Credit Union vs Wisconsin Latvian, Inc. Credit Union

Credit union

Kbr Heritage Federal Credit Union

Houston, Texas · Under $100 million in assets

90of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Wisconsin Latvian, Inc. Credit Union

Milwaukee, Wisconsin · Under $100 million in assets

69of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureKbr Heritage Federal Credit UnionWisconsin Latvian, Inc. Credit Union
TellerScore90 (stronger)69
Capital cushion100 (stronger)48
Loan quality87100 (stronger)
Earnings77 (stronger)22
Funding & liquidity87100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage98100 (stronger)
Peer percentile89th38th
Total assets$76.4M$3.2M
Deposits / shares$58.8M$2.8M
Capital ratio22.63% (stronger)9.77%
Problem loans0.39%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.17%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.42% (stronger)0.04%
Loans ÷ deposits73.6%49.2% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.6%0.0% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)28.6%—

Kbr Heritage Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (90 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Kbr Heritage Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Wisconsin Latvian, Inc. Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions