Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Legend Bank, N.A. vs The First Bank of Celeste
Metric by metric
| Measure | Legend Bank, N.A. | The First Bank of Celeste |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 (stronger) | 75 |
| Capital cushion | 54 (stronger) | 34 |
| Loan quality | 96 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 98 (stronger) | 74 |
| Funding & liquidity | 81 | 99 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 93rd | 54th |
| Total assets | $1.3B | $83.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.1B | $76.3M |
| Capital ratio | 10.35% (stronger) | 8.39% |
| Problem loans | 0.12% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.07% (stronger) | 0.07% |
| Return on assets | 1.95% (stronger) | 1.35% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 72.1% | 39.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.9% | 16.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 13 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 12.2% | — |
Legend Bank, N.A. has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 75). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Legend Bank, N.A. leads on 4 and The First Bank of Celeste on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.