Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Legend Bank, N.A. vs The First National Bank of Tom Bean
Metric by metric
| Measure | Legend Bank, N.A. | The First National Bank of Tom Bean |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 (stronger) | 67 |
| Capital cushion | 54 | 71 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 96 (stronger) | 59 |
| Earnings | 98 (stronger) | 62 |
| Funding & liquidity | 81 (stronger) | 65 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 85 |
| Peer percentile | 93rd | 34th |
| Total assets | $1.3B | $155.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.1B | $135.7M |
| Capital ratio | 10.35% | 12.15% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.12% (stronger) | 1.23% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.07% (stronger) | 0.38% |
| Return on assets | 1.95% (stronger) | 1.05% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 72.1% (stronger) | 93.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.9% | 17.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 13 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 12.2% | — |
Legend Bank, N.A. has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Legend Bank, N.A. leads on 5 and The First National Bank of Tom Bean on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.