Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Legends Bank vs Bank of Washington
Metric by metric
| Measure | Legends Bank | Bank of Washington |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 90 (stronger) | 44 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 75 |
| Loan quality | 83 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 55 |
| Funding & liquidity | 65 (stronger) | 40 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 (stronger) | 42 |
| Peer percentile | 95th | 4th |
| Total assets | $635.5M | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $515.2M | $887.8M |
| Capital ratio | 18.31% (stronger) | 12.47% |
| Problem loans | 0.51% (stronger) | 3.50% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 0.39% |
| Return on assets | 2.26% (stronger) | 0.86% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 88.1% (stronger) | 113.7% |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.6% (stronger) | 24.0% |
| Offices | 11 | 7 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 8.5% | 5.8% |
Legends Bank has the higher TellerScore (90 vs 44). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Legends Bank leads on 7 and Bank of Washington on 0. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.