Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Liberty Bank for Savings vs International Bank of Chicago
Metric by metric
| Measure | Liberty Bank for Savings | International Bank of Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 84 (stronger) | 82 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 75 |
| Loan quality | 99 (stronger) | 98 |
| Earnings | 36 | 93 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 78 (stronger) | 46 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 91 |
| Peer percentile | 86th | 82nd |
| Total assets | $868.6M | $982.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $656.8M | $863.0M |
| Capital ratio | 24.01% (stronger) | 12.54% |
| Problem loans | 0.04% (stronger) | 0.05% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.41% | 1.82% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 82.2% (stronger) | 85.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 6.8% (stronger) | 41.4% |
| Offices | 5 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 8.1% |
Liberty Bank for Savings has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 82). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Liberty Bank for Savings leads on 5 and International Bank of Chicago on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.