Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Lindell Bank & Trust Company vs Royal Banks of Missouri
Metric by metric
| Measure | Lindell Bank & Trust Company | Royal Banks of Missouri |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 92 (stronger) | 70 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 59 |
| Loan quality | 81 | 95 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 62 |
| Funding & liquidity | 83 (stronger) | 59 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 (stronger) | 75 |
| Peer percentile | 97th | 58th |
| Total assets | $915.2M | $1.0B |
| Deposits / shares | $707.2M | $891.6M |
| Capital ratio | 18.02% (stronger) | 10.93% |
| Problem loans | 0.58% | 0.16% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.05% (stronger) | 0.01% |
| Return on assets | 2.62% (stronger) | 1.05% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 75.0% (stronger) | 90.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 16.9% (stronger) | 25.2% |
| Offices | 15 | 16 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 4.4% | — |
Lindell Bank & Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 70). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Lindell Bank & Trust Company leads on 6 and Royal Banks of Missouri on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Saint Louis, MO
- Glendale, MO