Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Little Horn State Bank vs Three Rivers Bank of Montana
Metric by metric
| Measure | Little Horn State Bank | Three Rivers Bank of Montana |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 59 | 71 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 53 | 67 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 62 | 69 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 72 | 76 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 33 | 62 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 83 | 87 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 17th | 47th |
| Total assets | $412.6M | $293.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $347.5M | $257.9M |
| Capital ratio | 10.34% | 11.72% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.15% | 0.93% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.52% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.31% | 1.40% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 100.8% | 95.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 38.9% | 18.1% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 4.2% | — |
Three Rivers Bank of Montana has the higher TellerScore (71 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Little Horn State Bank leads on 0 and Three Rivers Bank of Montana on 7. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.