TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

MapleMark Bank vs Grand Savings Bank

Bank

MapleMark Bank

Tulsa, Oklahoma · $1 billion – $10 billion

59of 100
Moderate

Bank

Grand Savings Bank

Grove, Oklahoma · $1 billion – $10 billion

80of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMapleMark BankGrand Savings Bank
TellerScore5980 (stronger)
Capital cushion6670 (stronger)
Loan quality7879 (stronger)
Earnings29100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity3264 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9192 (stronger)
Peer percentile19th90th
Total assets$1.0B$1.0B
Deposits / shares$837.5M$897.8M
Capital ratio11.63%11.97% (stronger)
Problem loans0.66%0.63% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.01%-0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.22%2.19% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits94.6%92.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits45.4%18.4% (stronger)
Offices215
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)7.7%7.9%

Grand Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), MapleMark Bank leads on 0 and Grand Savings Bank on 7. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions