Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
MidAmerica National Bank vs Petefish, Skiles & Co.
Metric by metric
| Measure | MidAmerica National Bank | Petefish, Skiles & Co. |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 42 | 75 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 49 (stronger) | 41 |
| Loan quality | 0 | 95 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 54 | 88 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 85 (stronger) | 80 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 39 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 3rd | 61st |
| Total assets | $685.0M | $501.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $613.0M | $439.8M |
| Capital ratio | 9.86% (stronger) | 9.12% |
| Problem loans | 4.37% | 0.14% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.36% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.85% | 1.69% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 71.8% (stronger) | 80.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 17.7% | 9.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 5 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 23.8% | 17.9% |
Petefish, Skiles & Co. has the higher TellerScore (75 vs 42). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), MidAmerica National Bank leads on 2 and Petefish, Skiles & Co. on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.