Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Middlesex Federal Savings, F.A. vs Clinton Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Middlesex Federal Savings, F.A. | Clinton Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 65 (stronger) | 58 |
| Capital cushion | 50 (stronger) | 47 |
| Loan quality | 99 (stronger) | 83 |
| Earnings | 25 | 34 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 69 (stronger) | 61 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 72 |
| Peer percentile | 29th | 16th |
| Total assets | $654.4M | $744.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $576.5M | $581.6M |
| Capital ratio | 9.97% (stronger) | 9.65% |
| Problem loans | 0.04% (stronger) | 0.50% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.66% |
| Return on assets | 0.14% | 0.35% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 91.4% | 88.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 14.0% (stronger) | 25.0% |
| Offices | 3 | 8 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 1.3% | 11.4% |
Middlesex Federal Savings, F.A. has the higher TellerScore (65 vs 58). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Middlesex Federal Savings, F.A. leads on 5 and Clinton Savings Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.