Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Midland States Bank vs Teutopolis State Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Midland States Bank | Teutopolis State Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 97 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 51 | 97 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 52 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 69 | 91 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 79 | 98 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 82 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 27th | 100th |
| Total assets | $6.7B | $358.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $5.7B | $309.0M |
| Capital ratio | 10.08% | 14.72% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.43% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.89% | -0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.22% | 1.77% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.2% | 58.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 22.7% | 16.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 53 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 27.2% | — |
Teutopolis State Bank has the higher TellerScore (97 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Midland States Bank leads on 0 and Teutopolis State Bank on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.