TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union vs Apl Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

93of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Apl Federal Credit Union

Laurel, Maryland · $100 million – $1 billion

76of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMt Gilead Federal Credit UnionApl Federal Credit Union
TellerScore93 (stronger)76
Capital cushion100 (stronger)68
Loan quality100 (stronger)84
Earnings66 (stronger)65
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)84
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)94
Peer percentile94th68th
Total assets$78K$723.6M
Deposits / shares$63K$639.0M
Capital ratio17.49% (stronger)11.84%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.49%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.14%
Return on assets1.14% (stronger)1.13%
Loans ÷ deposits35.0% (stronger)76.0%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)9.8%
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—10.9%

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Apl Federal Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions