TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union vs Christiansted Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

93of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Christiansted Federal Credit Union

Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMt Gilead Federal Credit UnionChristiansted Federal Credit Union
TellerScore9398 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality100 (stronger)92
Earnings6698 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)99
Peer percentile94th98th
Total assets$78K$34.0M
Deposits / shares$63K$26.9M
Capital ratio17.49%20.63% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.23%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.22%
Return on assets1.14%1.96% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits35.0% (stronger)45.3%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)1.0%
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Christiansted Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 93). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Christiansted Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions