Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union vs Lee Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union
Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets
Credit union
Lee Federal Credit Union
Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union | Lee Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 93 | 99 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 66 | 95 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 99th |
| Total assets | $78K | $5.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $63K | $2.7M |
| Capital ratio | 17.49% | 50.68% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.14% | 1.86% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 35.0% (stronger) | 44.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Lee Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 93). On the 4 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and Lee Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.